|
Disclaimer:
The following information is drawn from materials prepared by
candidates for promotion to associate professor in one of the
scholarship-requiring tracks (RS and CS). It is intended to illustrate activities and materials that
might support promotion. In
using these materials, please note the following: *The
Provost (and, in some cases, the President) are the University officers
authorized to approve promotions.
All levels of review below these officers are advisory. *Only
Departments are empowered to propose promotions, and the Divisional Dean is
charged with transmitting such proposals to the Provost or returning them to
the Department. *The
judgment of the Department, Dean, and Provost will therefore be critical to
assessing qualification for promotion. *Materials
considered by the Department, Dean, and Provost will also (and always)
include confidential evaluations obtained from outside the University. Materials considered by the Provost
will include the confidential evaluations of the Dean and Department, and
those considered by the Dean will include the confidential evaluations of the
Department. *Thus,
the following materials are ONLY PART of a complete proposal for promotion, whereas
promotion is based on the ENTIRE proposal. Therefore, it should not be assumed that a record
comparable to that below will necessarily result in promotion, or that a
record not comparable to that below will fail to result in promotion. The Departmental Chair is likely to
be the best source of advice as to whether promotion is feasible and, when it
is not, what additional activity may result in qualification for promotion. *This
document has been prepared as a tool for use by assistant professors in the
Division of the Biological Sciences.
Other individuals who may find it informative are Department Chairmen,
Section Heads, Committee Chairmen, senior faculty and potential recruits. Its intent is to help guide
individuals and their departments as they think about promotion to
Professor. This document is not
intended to list the elements that every promotion proposal will be expected
to address. The following
information is presented for information purposes only and is not intended to
create any contract or agreement, and its contents are subject to addition,
deletion, and change without prior notice. |
|
|
Name |
Xiaoxi Zhuang, Ph.D. |
|
Department of Primary Appointment: |
Neurobiology |
|
Secondary appointments: |
Committee on Neurobiology Biological Sciences Collegiate Division |
|
Present track:
|
Research Scholar (Tenure) |
|
Proposed rank: |
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR |
|
Proposed track: |
RESEARCH SCHOLAR (TENURE) |
DEPARTMENT: What is the candidate's field or specialization?
|
Dr.
ZhuangÕs research is in the field of molecular and genetic studies of reward. |
LAY SUMMARY:
|
It has been
argued that dopamine is more associated with anticipatory desire and
motivation (commonly referred to as "wanting") as opposed to actual
consummatory pleasure (commonly referred to as "liking"). Dr. Zhuang
works on the molecular and neural pathways responsible for information
processing in the basal ganglia, the part of the brain known to be important
for movement, motivation and reward.
At the University of Chicago, his work has focused on the
neurotransmitter, dopamine, and how dopamine acts to modulate the function of
the basal ganglia. By genetically manipulating molecules that regulate
dopamine signaling, Dr. Zhuang has made a number of important findings. Animal behavior can be modified by
previous experiences with environmental conditions that lead to either reward
or punishment. The role of dopamine in this behavior modification has
been well known for decades.
However, how the specific aspects of those behaviors are mediated by
dopamine signals has not been specified. By using genetic manipulations
that selectively alter either the baseline tonic dopamine levels or the
highly temporally regulated phasic dopamine levels in mice, Xiaoxi's work has
demonstrated that it is the phasic dopamine that mediates reward
experience-dependent learning whereas it is the tonic dopamine that modulates
the strength of such learned behavioral responses (e.g. working for food
reward). At molecular level,
learning is represented by changes in connectivity in the brain. Dr. Zhuang's
work further demonstrates that one specific molecule, the adenylyl cyclase
type V, is likely the main player in mediating phasic dopamine induced
changes in connectivity in the basal ganglia. Dopamine is also known to be
important for movement, and the progressive loss of dopamine neurons is the
cause of ParkinsonÕs disease. However, the biochemical basis of selective
dopamine neuron loss in ParkinsonÕs disease remains uncharacterized. Dr. Zhuang's lab has generated a
number of transgenic ParkinsonÕs disease mouse models. His work has
demonstrated that dopamine itself, when it is not regulated, is toxic. Overall, Dr. Zhuang's's work is
gradually mapping out a important molecular players responsible for a number
of mental disorders: addiction, Parkinson's disease,
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, obesity and depression. |
CURRICULUM VITAE
|
HONORS AND AWARDS 1991-1996 Columbia
Faculty Fellowship 1999-2001
NARSAD
Young Investigator Award 2002-2004
NARSAD
Young Investigator Award 2006-present Edward
Mallinckrodt, Jr. Foundation Award PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Society for Neuroscience American Association for the
Advancement of Science Society of Biological
Psychiatry PEER REVIEW
ACTIVITIES --- JOURNALS (AD HOC) Journal of Neuroscience PNAS Journal of Biological Chemistry Journal of Neurophysiology Journal of Neurochemistry Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience European Journal of Neuroscience Behavioral Brain Research Biological Psychiatry Molecular Psychiatry Neuropsychopharmacology Psychopharmacology Experimental Neurology Neuroscience and
Biobehavioural Reviews Genesis Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease PEER REVIEW
ACTIVITIES --- GRANTS (AD HOC) Human Frontier Science Program The Department of Veterans Affairs University of Pittsburgh Pepper Center |
PRESENTATIONS
|
1.
Biochemical
and behavioral consequences of chronic hyperdopaminergia. Xenogen Biosciences, 2001, Invited 2.
Animal models
of catecholamine defects. First
Symposium on Pediatric Neurotransmitter Diseases, 2002, Invited 3.
A novel
gene trapping approach for conditional knockout. Symposium on Forward Genetics and Behavior, Chicago
Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting, 2002, Invited 4.
Genetic
and behavioral dissection of impulse control. Lehigh University Department of Biology, 2002, Invited 5.
Genetic
and behavioral dissection of impulse control. International Symposium on Behavioral Genomics, Beijing, China, 2002, Invited 6.
Genetic
and behavioral dissection of impulse control. Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science,
Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, 2003, Invited 7.
Genetic
and behavioral dissection of impulse control. Columbia University, Department of Psychology, 2003, Invited 8.
Opening
the black box with genetic tools: analysis of dopamine and control of
behavior. University of
Virginia Neuroscience Seminar Series,
2003, Invited 9.
Opening
the black box with genetic tools: analysis of dopamine and control of
behavior. Northwestern
University, Department of Physiology,
2003, Invited 10.
Opening
the black box with genetic tools: analysis of dopamine and control of
behavior. International
Conference on Genetic Basis of Brain, Mind and Behavior, Beijing, China, 2004, Invited 11.
Opening
the black box with genetic tools: analysis of dopamine and control of
behavior. Loyola University,
Department of Pharmacology,
2005, Invited 12.
Opening
the black box with genetic tools: analysis of dopamine and control of
behavior. University
of Tennessee Health Science Center, Neuroscience Institute, 2006, Invited 13.
The role
of phasic and tonic dopamine in reward-based learning, response vigor and
choice behavior. NIAAA, NIH
2007, Invited 14.
The role
of phasic and tonic dopamine in reward-based learning, response vigor and
choice behavior. Ernest Gallo Clinic &
Research Center, UCSF, 2007, Invited 15.
The role
of phasic and tonic dopamine in reward-based learning, response vigor and
choice behavior. Columbia University,
Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, 2007, Invited |