Many faculty seeking promotion in this track (and their mentors) continue to be uncertain about what level of external recognition/significant internal impact is sufficient for promotion. To address this issue, links are provided below to the candidate's portion of e-forms submitted as part of actual recent successful promotions cases. While these postings may be helpful in exemplifying the level of achievement that is necessary, please read the following disclaimer carefully:

Disclaimer: The following information is drawn from materials prepared by candidates for promotion to associate professor in the Clinician-Educator track, and is presented with the candidates' permission. It is intended to illustrate activities and materials that might support promotion. In using these materials, please note the following:

*The Provost (and, in some cases, the President) are the University officers authorized to approve promotions. All levels of review below these officers are advisory.

*Only Departments are empowered to propose promotions, and the Divisional Dean is charged with transmitting such proposals to the Provost or returning them to the Department.

*The judgment of the Department, Dean, and Provost will therefore be critical to assessing qualification for promotion.

*Materials considered by the Department, Dean, and Provost will also (and always) include confidential evaluations obtained from outside the University. Materials considered by the Provost will include the confidential evaluations of the Dean and Department, and those considered by the Dean will include the confidential evaluations of the Department.

*Thus, the following materials are ONLY PART of a complete proposal for promotion, whereas promotion is based on the ENTIRE proposal. Therefore, it should not be assumed that a record comparable to that below will necessarily result in promotion, or that a record not comparable to that below will fail to result in promotion. The Departmental Chair is likely to be the best source of advice as to whether promotion is feasible and, when it is not, what additional activity may result in qualification for promotion.

*This document has been prepared as a tool for use by assistant professors in the Division of the Biological Sciences. Other individuals who may find it informative are Department Chairmen, Section Heads, Committee Chairmen, senior faculty and potential recruits. Its intent is to help guide individuals and their departments as they think about promotion to Associate Professor in the Clinician-Educator track. This document is not intended to list the elements that every promotion proposal will be expected to address. The following information is presented for information purposes only and is not intended to create any contract or agreement, and its contents are subject to addition, deletion, and change without prior notice.

Anderson, Allen (Medicine, 2005)

Benjamin, Holly (Pediatrics, 2006)

Cifu, Adam (Medicine, 2005)

Harper, William (Medicine, 2007)

Hostetler, Mark (Pediatrics, 2006)

Hunter, Scott (Psychiatry, 2007)

Jolly, Neeraj (Medicine, 2007)

Koenig, Peter (Pediatrics, 2006)

Langan, George (Surgery, 2007)

Mauer, Anne (Medicine, 2006)

Mitchell, Myrosia (Radiology, 2005)

Podrazik, Paula (Medicine, 2007)