| Primitive
shark-like fishes (chondrichthyans) include the origins of modern
sharks, rays and chimaeroids (rat fishes), early forms of which
are much less well known than those of their bony relatives. The
absence of a bony internal skeleton has resulted in a fossil record
consisting mostly of isolated teeth and scales, although rare caches
of spectacularly preserved skeletal remains are known. Modern sharks
tend to be treated as primitive relics of an earlier era, although
this sits uncomfortably with the alternative clichéd view
of sharks as ultimate marine predators. Both notions rest on shaky
foundations. Modern sharks are not especially similar to their early
relatives, whose sometimes bizarre anatomy in certain respects converges
on that of early bony fishes (osteichthys) (see example of Akmonistion;
Coates et al. 1998 - pdf; Coates
& Sequeira 2001 - pdf).
The aim of the chondrichthyan project is to resolve early chondrichthyan
phylogeny by means of using a wide variety of data, and to provide
the basis for a renewed examination of basal jawed vertebrates as
a whole. All early gnathostomes are possible targets for future
work, including memberships of the extinct groups such as placoderms
and acanthodians, as well as key gnathostome anatomical systems,
including jaws, teeth, and paired fins (Smith & Coates; Coates
Acta Biotheoretica).
The ray-finned fishes are the largest and most diverse group of
living vertebrates, but little has been agreed about the timing
and pattern of their early evolution. Collaborative research with
Prince and Ho
labs, and colleagues elsewhere, has resulted in a revised time-scale
of their evolutionary history and raised major questions about the
completeness of their fossil record (Hurley et al 2007 - pdf;
and the cover image). This work exemplifies
OBA’s aim to promote integrative research, and uses a total-evidence
approach combining fossils with molecular sequence data drawn from
mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Fossil ray-finned fishes are probably
the largest and least explored resource for the exploration of vertebrate
historical biodiversity, and the potential for further research
is considerable (Coates 1999 - pdf).
Selected Publications
Jeffery, J.E., Richardson, M.K., Coates, M.I. and Bininda-Emonds,
O.R.P. 2002. Analysing Developmental Sequences Within a Phylogenetic
Framework. Systematic Biology 51(3): 1-14. (PubMed)
Coates, M.I. and Sequeira, S.E.K. 2001. A new stethacanthid chondrichthyan
from the Lower Carboniferous of Bearsden, Scotland. Journal of Vertebrate
Paleontology 21: 438-459.
Smith, M.M. & Coates, M.I. 2001. The evolution of vertebrate
dentitions: phylogenetic pattern and developmental models. In: Major
events in early vertebrate evolution: palaeontology, phylogeny and
development. (ed. Ahlberg, P.E.). London: Taylor & Francis,
pp. 223-240.
Coates, M.I. 2001. The origin of tetrapods. In: Palaeobiology II
(eds Briggs, D.E.G. & Crowther, P.R.). Oxford: Blackwell Science,
pp. 74-79.
Richardson, M.K., Jeffery, J.E., Coates, M.I. & Bininda-Emonds,
O.R.P. 2001. Comparative Methods in Developmental Biology. Zoology
104: 278-283. (PubMed)
Basden, A.M., Young, G.C., Coates, M.I. & Ritchie, A. 2000.
The most primitive osteichthyan braincase? Nature 403: 185-188.
(PubMed)
Coates, M.I. 1996. The Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik: postcranial anatomy, basal tetrapod relationships and patterns of skeletal evolution. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 87: 363-421. (pdf - Note: large file ~27 Mb)/a>
(back to Faculty by name)
(back to Faculty by research interest)
(page top) |